Impact calculator for tourists

Part I – Regenerative Tourism Questionnaire for Tourists
Part II – Regenerative Tourism Questionnaire (Please evaluate current travel experience)
Part III – Regenerative practices (1–5)
Part IV – Perceived Results and Impact (Well-being & Experiential Regeneration)
Part V – Challenges and Opportunities

Country:

Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Poland Sweden Other (Please write)

Please specify:

Part I – Regenerative Tourism Questionnaire for Tourists

How would you rate your familiarity with the concept of regenerative tourism?

I am very familiar I am somewhat familiar I am slightly familiar I have not heard this concept

Are you currently consciously implementing regenerative tourism (leaving a place better than you found it https://www.gstc.org/regenerative-tourism/) practices during your current travel?

Yes, I actively implement them Partially (I implement some elements, but I don't call it "regeneration") No, but I am planning to start No, and I am not planning to I don't know / Not applicable

Part II – Regenerative Tourism Questionnaire (Please evaluate current travel experience)

1. General Information

Number of travelers: How many people travelled with you?

Length of stay (in days): How long did the trip/stay last?

Type of tourism: (Select from list) e.g., individual, family, group, business, other

Individual Family Group Business Other

Please specify:

2. Carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions

Transport:

Arrival/Departure: Type of transport

Arrival/Departure: Approximate distance (km)

Local transport: Means of transportation used during the stay

Local transport: Approximate distance (km)

Accommodation:

Type of lodging

Hotel Guesthouse Rural tourism homestead Rented apartment Camping

Energy efficiency: Does the accommodation use renewable energy or apply energy-saving measures?

Yes No Don't know

Activities:

Main activities

Please specify:

3. Water consumption

Water-saving measures: Are water-saving measures implemented in the accommodation (e.g., special shower heads, option to change bed linen/towels less frequently)?

Yes No Don't know

4. Waste generation

Waste sorting: Were wastes sorted during activities/accommodation (plastic, paper, glass, organic waste)?

Yes No Don't know

Use of disposable packaging: What was the level of disposable product use (e.g., plastic bottles, dishes)?

High Medium Low

5. Impact on local economy and community

Accommodation expenses: Does the accommodation service belong to a local business or an international chain?

Local International Don't know

Food expenses: What share of food was purchased from local suppliers (farmers' markets, local cafes/restaurants) rather than international supermarkets/restaurants?

Majority About half Minority

Services and entertainment: Were local guides, artisans, or entertainment providers used?

Yes No

Employees: Are the service providers (e.g., in hotels, restaurants) local residents?

Majority About half Minority Don't know

Part III – Regenerative Practices and Governance (Please evaluate current travel experience)

Please rate each statement about your activities and the destination's overall governance using a 5-point Likert scale

1 = Strongly disagree · 2 = Disagree · 3 = Neutral · 4 = Agree · 5 = Strongly agree · 0 = Don't know / Cannot answer

A. Ecological Regeneration (Nature-Positive)

Do you actively participate in ecosystem restoration projects during your trip (e.g., habitat restoration, tree planting, biodiversity enhancement).

1 2 3 4 5 0

Are you doing efforts or interested in CO₂ reduction and/or offsetting.

1 2 3 4 5 0

Are you doing efforts or interested in water conservation and pollution reduction measures.

1 2 3 4 5 0

Do you apply circular economy principles during your trip (e.g., active waste sorting, composting, avoiding single-use plastics).

1 2 3 4 5 0

B. Economic Regeneration (Community-Positive)

During this trip, I prioritized purchasing goods and services from local suppliers (e.g., farmers, artisans, local providers).

1 2 3 4 5 0

I specifically chose local services that appear to provide fairly paid jobs for local residents.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I gave preference to service providers that reinvest a portion of their profits or time into local community needs.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I consciously tried to ensure my spending stayed within the local economy rather than going to external/international owners.

1 2 3 4 5 0

C. Social-Community Regeneration

I actively sought out or preferred organizations where the local community seemed meaningfully involved in decisions.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I chose to support businesses that visibly prioritize hiring employees from the local community.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I valued and supported organizations that invest in the training and skill development of local employees.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I paid attention to whether services were inclusive and accessible (e.g., for people with disabilities or marginalized groups) when making my choices.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I participated in or supported activities that clearly contribute to the social well-being of the community.

1 2 3 4 5 0

D. Cultural Regeneration

I actively avoided commercialized attractions in favor of experiences that maintain the authenticity of local heritage.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I chose to visit places or buy products that involve collaboration with local artists, artisans, or cultural institutions.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I took time to learn from my hosts about local heritage, traditions, and responsible behavior norms.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I supported organizations that strengthen local identity and the "local voice" rather than commercializing or distorting it.

1 2 3 4 5 0

E. Regenerative Governance (Stewardship)

I preferred to engage with tourism providers that collaborate with others (NGOs, public authorities) to achieve environmental/social goals.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I looked for information or signs that the tourism organizations base their decisions on reliable data and impact monitoring.

1 2 3 4 5 0

It was important for me that the destination's governance appeared transparent and included the views of local stakeholders.

1 2 3 4 5 0

Part IV – Perceived Results and Impact (Well-being & Experiential Regeneration)

This section assesses your opinion on the impact of regenerative tourism on business, local residents, and visitors.

1 = Strongly disagree · 2 = Disagree · 3 = Neutral · 4 = Agree · 5 = Strongly agree · 0 = Don't know / Cannot answer

Impact on Business and Well-being

The implementation of regenerative practices in this destination significantly increased my satisfaction with the trip.

1 2 3 4 5 0

The regenerative approach improved my perception and trust in the local tourism organizations I visited.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I was willing to pay a premium price for services in this trip because of their contribution to regeneration.

1 2 3 4 5 0

The experiences offered by local organizations enhanced my psychological restoration (sense of peace) and deep connection to this place.

1 2 3 4 5 0

My experience was enhanced by witnessing the local residents' sense of pride in their place.

1 2 3 4 5 0

Assessment of Visitor Awareness

During this trip, I showed a genuine interest in learning about regeneration principles.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I personally prioritized experiences that clearly benefit local communities over standard tourist attractions.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I felt a greater sense of satisfaction when I had the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to improving the place (e.g., volunteering, education).

1 2 3 4 5 0

I am willing to pay more for a tourism service that clearly contributes to local regeneration.

1 2 3 4 5 0

I valued transparent reporting on environmental and social efforts by the organizations I visited.

1 2 3 4 5 0

Part V – Challenges and Opportunities

What do you think are the main challenges facing in implementing regenerative tourism practices? (Check all that apply)

Financial constraints / Initial investment Lack of knowledge, data, or trained staff Lack of time Limited customer demand / understanding Regulatory / bureaucratic barriers Difficulty in finding local suppliers Difficulty in collaborating with other organizations Limited support from local authorities or policymakers Challenges in measuring impact and outcomes Risk of "greenwashing" Other

Please specify:

What are the main barriers preventing you from choosing travel options that implementing regenerative tourism practices? (Check all that apply)

Higher costs (such services are often more expensive) Lack of information (I don't know what it is or where to find such services) Planning difficulties (it takes too much time and effort to find responsible suppliers) Limited options (there are not enough attractive services or activities to choose from) Unclear impact (it is hard to understand if my choice truly helps; doubts about "greenwashing") Concerns about comfort (fear that sustainable choices might be less comfortable/convenient) Other

Please specify:

What would most encourage or help you to contribute more to regenerative tourism? (Check the 3 most important)

Financial incentives (discounts, coupons, or loyalty points for responsible choices) Clear labeling and certification (trusted signs or logos that help quickly identify responsible businesses) Clear recommendations / Guides (easily accessible information on specific things I can do or visit) Impact feedback (the ability to see how my visit specifically helped the community or nature) Engaging storytelling (more information about the local culture/people and why they need support) Convenient digital tools (apps or maps showing sustainable routes) Other

Please select at most 3.

Please specify:

Cancel